Election 2012: Polls and Lies

Election 2012: Polls and Lies

� (Picture compliments of IOwntheWorld.com)

When whiny, old Dave Obamalackey Letterman makes snarky jokes about the president after months of mocking Romney, you can smell a change in the election air.

With four weeks to go before Barack Hussein Obama and his henchmen dispatch their Black Panther storm troopers to intimidate white voters again and try to steal the election after years of deceiving his supporters and months of misrepresenting Mitt Romney, it’s obvious the political worm is gradually turning.

Besides Letterman, there are a number of other indicators suggesting Obama and his ilk will lose big time on November 6th and be denied the opportunity to subvert our country further and once more fool a plurality into casting their ballots for an egomaniacal, radical socialist.

 

.� Last week, the Military Times announced that its poll of 3100 active and reserve troops shows the core of the U.S. military favors Mitt Romney over President Obama by a whopping 66% to 26% based on the economy and the candidates character.

 

.� On Monday, Zogby Analytics gave Romney a 3% lead on national security and a 6% percent advantage on jobs and the economy.

 

.� On Tuesday, Rasmussen reported that the challenger has moved ahead in all 11 swing states.

 

Why any rational individual voted for Obama in 2008 has long been a mystery to me.  Why anyone could entertain the vaguest notion of voting for him in 2012 is beyond mysterious and enters the realm of fantastical absurdity.

In view of the continuing, sorry state of the economy, the undermining of our national integrity following revelations that the administration sacrificed the lives of four Americans in Benghazi on the altars of Islamic appeasement and political correctness, the utter failure of Obama’s approach to the Arab Spring, the gender, racial, and class divisiveness he has created, the only explanation for Obama’s re-nomination is that the Democrat Party has lost its collective mind, probably as a consequence of its loss of interest in America’s future.

 

It’s no wonder the White House has virtually ended daily press briefings. Even Jay Carney has his lying limits.

 

In a highly significant political worm-turning, the president has seemingly lost one of his prime hole cards. For the most part, his race card is working just fine but he apparently is losing the ridiculous War on Women card. . .

(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=28240)

The Ugly War Against Women

The Ugly War Against Women

This unrelenting war against women must stop and the misogynists waging it must be punished! 

It was bad enough when Rush Limbaugh criticized law student/liberal political agitator Sandra Fluke for wanting taxpayers to pay for her birth control so that she didn’t have to lay out fifty cents or a buck for a condom.  Okay, in her case poor Sandra needed a bunch of bucks since she seems to be exceptionally frisky.

      It was bad enough that Limbaugh has said repeatedly over the years that “Feminism was established to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream.”  Okay, he may have a valid point there considering such feminist icons as Betty Friedan, Ruth Ginsburg, Whoopi Goldberg, et al. 

Nevertheless, to make a blanket statement that liberal Democrat women are uglier than Republican women is way beyond the pale and outrageously sexist as well as emblematic of how far some people will go, of how low they will go, in the ongoing war against the fair sex.

However, it was not Limbaugh who said liberal women were unattractive but a study by two female University of California Los Angeles researchers, Kerri Johnson and Colleen Carpinella has found that they are. 

The researchers concluded after careful study that ”Female politicians with stereotypically feminine facial features are more likely to be Republican than Democrat” and that ”Female politicians with less stereotypically feminine facial features were more likely to be Democrats, and the more liberal their voting record, the greater the distance the politician’s appearance strayed from stereotypical gender norms.” . . . 
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=28242.)