Election 2012: Polls and Lies

Election 2012: Polls and Lies

� (Picture compliments of IOwntheWorld.com)

When whiny, old Dave Obamalackey Letterman makes snarky jokes about the president after months of mocking Romney, you can smell a change in the election air.

With four weeks to go before Barack Hussein Obama and his henchmen dispatch their Black Panther storm troopers to intimidate white voters again and try to steal the election after years of deceiving his supporters and months of misrepresenting Mitt Romney, it’s obvious the political worm is gradually turning.

Besides Letterman, there are a number of other indicators suggesting Obama and his ilk will lose big time on November 6th and be denied the opportunity to subvert our country further and once more fool a plurality into casting their ballots for an egomaniacal, radical socialist.

 

.� Last week, the Military Times announced that its poll of 3100 active and reserve troops shows the core of the U.S. military favors Mitt Romney over President Obama by a whopping 66% to 26% based on the economy and the candidates character.

 

.� On Monday, Zogby Analytics gave Romney a 3% lead on national security and a 6% percent advantage on jobs and the economy.

 

.� On Tuesday, Rasmussen reported that the challenger has moved ahead in all 11 swing states.

 

Why any rational individual voted for Obama in 2008 has long been a mystery to me.  Why anyone could entertain the vaguest notion of voting for him in 2012 is beyond mysterious and enters the realm of fantastical absurdity.

In view of the continuing, sorry state of the economy, the undermining of our national integrity following revelations that the administration sacrificed the lives of four Americans in Benghazi on the altars of Islamic appeasement and political correctness, the utter failure of Obama’s approach to the Arab Spring, the gender, racial, and class divisiveness he has created, the only explanation for Obama’s re-nomination is that the Democrat Party has lost its collective mind, probably as a consequence of its loss of interest in America’s future.

 

It’s no wonder the White House has virtually ended daily press briefings. Even Jay Carney has his lying limits.

 

In a highly significant political worm-turning, the president has seemingly lost one of his prime hole cards. For the most part, his race card is working just fine but he apparently is losing the ridiculous War on Women card. . .

(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=28240)

Grading the Eye-Candy Man's Debate

Grading the Eye-Candy Man's Debate

The first debate between the two antagonists vying for the privilege to lead the United States of America for the next four years, each intending to impress the American electorate with his intelligence, knowledge, and expertise, represented not only a crushing blow to Barack Hussein Obama’s re-election prospects. 

It also stands as yet another exposé of his fundamental ineptitude and his outrageous pretensions to being the much-heralded, most brilliant, and most articulate president in our nation’s history. 

  In fact, absent his teleprompters which his handlers customarily use to dictate everything he says and how he says it, Obama came across as an ignorant dolt serving far above his pay grade and totally unqualified to speak intelligently, let alone serve as president. 

When my son was a freshman at Penn State, his professor in a public speaking class assigned his first speech a C- and explained his reason for the low grade: My son had used the “uh-word” excessively, a sign he either hadn’t prepared well enough, that he wasn’t confident in the speech’s contents, or that he knew he was wrong in what he said.

BuzzFeed.com has compiled an amusing/scary video collection of our scholar-president’s wasted 51 seconds repeatedly uttering the “uh-word.” 

A lousy overall performance anyway, it would have been awarded a D+ at best by my son’s prof based on his “uhs” alone. . . 
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=28319.

Snoop Dog's Doggy Doo-Doo

Snoop Dog's Doggy Doo-Doo

  The ever-classy Calvin Cordozar Broadus, Jr. who lately goes by the name Snoop Lion after dumping Doggy Dogg and Snoop Dogg has added another title to his already impressive résumé: Presidential Political Analyst.   

The oft-imprisoned Calvin instagrammed a purloined list of the 10 reasons he’s not voting for Mitt Romney and 10 reasons he is voting for Barack Obama, all of which vividly demonstrate his incisively awesome capacity to insightfully analyze the candidates.  

All 20 represent more than sufficient, substantive information for undecideds to decide who gets their votes on November 6th.

   Among Snoop Lion’s very cogent observations on Romney is that ”He a white n*****r” and the “muthaf*****s  name is Mitt” (repeated for emphasis), that “He a ho” who “looks like he say n****r all the time,” that “He a Mormon who ain’t got hoes,” and he reminds Calvin “of every boss I ever hated,” all reasons enough for the Snoopster’s threat, “Bitch I will beat the s**t out of you.” 

Calvin also includes Ann Romney in his critique, pointing out “Bitch got a dancing horse.”

Snoop Lion may not think much of the Romneys but he is enthralled by the Obamas. 
  As contrasted with the Mittster, that Barack, “He a black n****r,” “mad cool,” “He wears a durag just like me” and uses the same hair clippers, he hugged and sniffed Beyonce’, smokes Newports and “I seen that n****r hoop before and he got a jumper.” 

He accords the president’s wife . . .  (http://tiny.cc/rz1rlw) 

(Editor’s note: The Snoopster didn’t use asterisks. . . 

(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=28337.)

The Obama Videos and Black Racism

The Obama Videos and Black Racism

Now that the first presidential debate is over and even the Left agrees the contender creamed the incumbent, it should be pointed out that Romney trounced Obama without ever using his best punch–video evidence that the president is a black racist.  

By now just about everyone has heard about the video of then-Senator Barack Hussein Obama in which he alleged that the slow response to the ravages caused by Hurricane Katrina was motivated not by incompetence but by white racism against the black population of New Orleans. 

Some readers may have seen a 4-minute clip from Obama’s speech and a few may have seen his entire 36-minute, 22 second, 2007 address to a largely-black audience at Hampton University.  For those who missed the latter, it can be seen here, along with specifics on his racist diatribe: (http://tinyurl.com/92ketk7) 

Also, do see a shocking side-by-side video comparison of what Obama said to blacks in 2007 versus what he said to the nation during the last campaign as he hypocritically preached race-neutrality. 

Suffice to say, Senator Obama’s rhetoric and speech patterns when he spoke at Hampton University were markedly different from candidate Obama’s rhetoric and manner when he spoke to a diverse national audience. 

The two videos graphically clarify the issue of “Who is the real Obama?”  He is clearly not a race healer, he’s more akin to the stereotypical angry black man. http://tinyurl.com/8kb5l7t   

However, the words the president chose five and four years ago and how he expressed them do serve a worthwhile purpose: They finally make vividly clear what many of us have believed since 2008, namely that Obama doesn’t much like white people and that America has been engaged in an undeclared race war ever since he took office.  

Demonstrating abject ignorance, the best-defense-is-a-good-offense strategy, or both, in an amazing display of misleading chutzpa, a deputy editor of the Washington Post’s editorial page wrote that “racism could sway the [presidential] election.” 

That view is eminently defensible. The chutzpa enters the scenario with Colbert King’s distorted opinion based entirely on disturbed social media rants, a miniscule sampling of fruitcakes. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=28249.)

Obama's Chief Constituency

Obama's Chief Constituency

  President Barack Hussein Obama has a number of powerful and loyal constituencies in his camp, ranging from white guilters to the homosexual lobby to food stampers to labor unions and to the Jewish lobby, all of whom–except for those belatedly suffering from white guilt and Jewish voters–have benefited greatly from Obama’s policies over the past 3 3/4 years. 

However, none of those voting blocs have been more faithful to the president than African-Americans most of whom still support him even though, like the white guilters and Jews, he has done nothing worthwhile for them.   Growing black unemployment and poverty rates to historic levels is hardly a plus.

The millions of whites who voted for Obama in 2008 out of a bizarre, misplaced guilt over slavery or because they felt it was time for a minority to rule the country have been rewarded with a blatantly racist administration and Jews who voted for him mainly because they have always voted Democrat have been rewarded with an overt antipathy toward Israel. 

Still, in a sad commentary on America’s electorate, it looks as if the majority of those two groups will cast their ballots for more of the same on November 6th.

I guess some people just enjoy being abused.

Even sadder is the case of African-Americans who by all accounts will vote for Obama based on the fact he is one of their own, sort of.

It’s doubtful the president will again win 95% of their vote but close to 90% is still a safe bet despite the 3,700 member Coalition of Black Pastors condemnation of his “evolved” position on same-sex marriage. 

  Black actor Samuel L. Jackson, black Brooklyn rapper Jay-Z, an unidentified black woman protesting against Mitt Romney in Cleveland, even white entertainer Madonna all back Obama, Jackson and Jay-Z because he’s semi-black, the protestor because he gave her a free cell phone, and Madonna because she’s losing her marbles and believes “We have a black Muslim in the White House.”

Barack Hussein Obama may be a lot of things but to my knowledge he hasn’t joined crazy Louis Farrakhan’s crazier Nation of Islam as of September 30th, 2012. 

Maybe after November.

  Another known crazy, Sirius XM shock jock Howard Stern, occasionally meanders into shocking, political reality.  Last week, Stern dispatched his field crew, Sal and Richard, to Harlem . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=28222.)

Liberal Poll Dancing

Liberal Poll Dancing

Mark Twain’s famous line effectively equating ”lies, damned lies, and statistics” could have included “and political polls, too!”

  It’s doubtful either Mitt Romney or Barack Hussein Obama are much into “Sopranos”-style pole dancing but it’s sure as tootin’ that the Obama team and his media surrogates have been dancing around opinion polls as if they were maypoles and reveling in their ability to manipulate them like gyrating strippers while pretending they’re not campaigning for Obama’s re-election.  

The myriad polls this election season generally have Obama beating Romney by a few points, except for those reporting the governor beating the president by a few and others showing it’s pretty much a horse race. 

We don’t hear about the latter two, however.

The obvious point is that opinions recorded six weeks before Election Day are about as meaningful and reliable as the promises Obama made in 2008 yet the polls showing he will win in November are interpreted by the MSM as absolutely, indisputably accurate indicators of Obama’s victory. 

Polls can be and often are skewed by pollsters in order to arrive at their desired results, a ploy now being  used by liberals to persuade the electorate that the president is a shoo-in on November 6th to dissuade Republicans from even bothering to vote. 

If it were not such a momentous election, the recent poll indicating Obama is leading Romney by 49 to 42 percent among NASCAR enthusiasts could be seen as comical.

Now, granted Mitt probably has as little real interest as Barack in Richard Petty and Jeff Gordon but to conclude that predominantly right wing  NASCAR aficionados favor by seven percentage points the radical Obama over the quasi-conservative, middle-of-the-roader Romney suggests the pollsters were on drugs, drunk, out to make a statement on the election, or all of the above. 

Dick Morris, a known toe-sucker but nevertheless an astute political analyst,  capsulized the poll situation in his recent piece titled “Mitt Romney Pulls Ahead.” 

He wrote, “The published polling in this year’s presidential race is unusually inaccurate because this is the first election in which who votes determines how they vote.  Obama’s massive leads among blacks, Latinos, young people, and single women vie with Romney’s margin among the elderly, married white women, and white men.” 

Morris clarified that view by pointing out that ”most pollsters are using [deceptive] 2008 party preferences to weight their 2012 survey samples.”  (http://tiny.cc/4q19kw)

Closely related to the underhanded tactic of twisting poll findings is the manipulation of the news by the liberal mainstreamers who have frequently been proven to be deeply and unethically ensconced in the Obama camp for at least five years.  

Not that it needed confirmation but CBS confirmed that bias on Sunday. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=28187.)

"All This Just for a Damn Flag?"--Michelle Obama

"All This Just for a Damn Flag?"--Michelle Obama


I’ve been told it’s merely a dastardly rumor that First Lady Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama disdainfully whispered to President Barack Hussein Obama  during solemn ceremonies observing the tenth anniversary of the 9/11 Islamic terrorist attacks on the United States, “All this just for a damn flag?” and the POTUS  supposedly reacted with a sneering nod and facial expression unmistakably denoting agreement with the FLOTUS’ contempt. 

In the brief clip from a year ago, which somehow went un-reported by the mainstream media, Lady O is seen turning to her husband and mouthing  something sotto voce to him as the mournful strains of bagpipes are heard in the background. 

In case the reader didn’t hear the bagpipes and see Michelle’s mouthing, catch the clip here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OCjMaWZKWU .  Another site shows the scene in three speeds http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJgWMI0hch8. 
  Over the past year, precisely what Mrs. Obama said has been disputed by the Obama Camp which denies she could possibly be so shallow, insensitive, and disrespectful toward the emblem of the United States of America by saying “All this just for a damn flag?” as if honoring America’s flag at a September 11th  commemoration could ever be problematic. 

Even more outrageous is that the president could concur with her.  

In the public interest and in my ceaseless quest for truth, justice, and the American way, I wouldn’t post the YouTube links without verifying what the woman who finally became proud of her country four years ago at the age of 44 had really said. 

I therefore turned to a trusted family member, a highly-experienced speech therapist skilled in lip reading, to determine what the FLOTUS whispered to the POTUS while the nation was remembering the horrors of September 11th, 2001. 

After a painstaking review of the videos and reading Lady O’s lips, our family speech therapist concluded . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=28143.)

"2016:Obama's America"--Rated NRC

"2016 Obama's America"--Rated NRC

The Motion Picture Association of America assigned a PG rating to the Dinesh D’Souza-Gerald R. Molen political documentary “2016: Obama’s America” due to ”thematic elements, brief language and smoking images”.  

After seeing the film, I can unequivocably say the MPAA missed the ratings boat.  “2016″ deserves an entirely new classification: “NRC–Not Recommended for Conservatives” due to redundancy and disturbing reality.

The film is redundant in that most conservatives have long been aware that the election of Barack Hussein Obama in 2008 was the unfortunate,  intended consequence of a meticulously-orchestrated joint Democrat Party/MSM scam designed to install an extreme leftist in the most powerful office on Earth by concealing the truth about his heritage, his family, his associations, and his education. 

  For my part, the only exception to the old news quality of 2016 was the inclusion of an interview of Obama’s
impoverished half-brother George Obama who still lives in a miniscule shack outside Nairobi, Kenya.  Millionaire Barack shamelessly preaches that we are indeed our brothers’ keepers and lives in mansion yet hasn’t offered to do a damned thing to help out poor George. 

You see, Barack’s Kenyan, half-sibling fundamentally disagrees with his rich, half-black American president on certain issues and for that reason can rot in his Kenyan hut-hell.    

“2016″ is also not recommended for conservatives because, although most knew some of the hidden and damning details concerning Obama’s background and beliefs, to have those disturbing facts concentrated in 89 minutes on the silver screen can literally be overwhelming.  I heard and saw a number of audience members weeping during and after the screening. 

As one exiting, crying moviegoer, no doubt a member of that dastardly tea party, observed to my wife, “That bastard has to go!”  I just hope she wasn’t referring to me!  

The audience were not shaken as much by the film’s content as by the suggestions of what America will be like a mere four years down the road should Obama be re-elected.  To all but his most ardent admirers who still fondly regard him as the nation’s savior, Obama’s America in 2016 is not a pretty picture. 

(For more details see “2016 Obama’s America”: http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=27723 and watch D’Souza deftly dismantle foul-mouthed Bill Maher’s objections to the truths in the film: http://tiny.cc/24vfkw.)   

Predictably panned by the same mainstream media that elected Obama, ”2016″ has been characterized. . .  (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=27965.)

Sick Liberal Puppies: Part One

Sick Liberal Puppies: Part One

Some years ago, I inadvertently cornered a huge raccoon gorging on dog food in the back of my garage.  Surprised and angered by my interruption of its late night meal, the raccoon reacted by baring its teeth and snarling menacingly–much like liberals literally and metaphorically act when they smell defeat. 

A liberal low-life hacked into Mia Love’s Wikipedia page and posted  scurrilous comments about the African-American mayor of Saratoga Springs, Utah, GOP candidate for Congress, and Tuesday’s brilliant speaker at the RNC convention.  

Calling the conservative Ms. Love a “token,” an “Aunt Tom,” a  “House Nigger” and a “dirty, worthless whore” constituted a common instance of racist, leftist  misogyny and wasn’t unusual for our liberal friends. 

Yahoo News’ Washington bureau chief David Chalian once again betrayed the liberal taint of the media when he was overheard on a hot mic slandering the presumptive Republican nominee for president and his wife. 

The churlish Chalian remarked that Mitt and Ann Romney were “not concerned at all” and indeed were “happy to have a party [the convention] with black people drowning” because of tropical storm Isaac.  As disgusting as it was, his racist slur was not unusual for a liberal.  

That Yahoo fired Chalian doesn’t mitigate the unavoidable truth that  America’s left-wingers are largely composed of mean-spirited, misanthropic sickos who, confronted with an adverse reality–in this case the possibility that Barack Hussein Obama will be banished to Chicago next January–get even sicker.

They make snarling animals look good by comparison.

Adversity offers the opportunity to rise above failure and move on to better things or to rail at life’s unfairness, wallow in recriminations, and hurl epithets and slanders. 

Not known for possessing optimistic mindsets, liberals are vulnerable to railing and wallowing.  Rather than benefit from adversity as a learning experience, they use it as an excuse to lash out at actual and imagined enemies–just like cornered raccoons. 

I don’t refer to libs such as the overachieving, formerly pretty, perky Katie Couric who recently voiced her fury with CBS bigwigs for  “projecting their own issues onto me” since Couric says she felt “liberated” after being forced out of her anchor job on CBS’ “Evening News.” 

Nor am I referring to NBC’s “Today” hostess Ann Curry who claimed she was canned by network executives because they didn’t like her fashion sense and certainly not because of her lackluster, hosting shortcomings. 

While Couric’s and Curry’s complaints are attributable to plain, old mid-life bitchiness, as the Romney-Obama presidential race develops into a real horse race in which the president is looking more and more like an also-ran, liberals are showing clear signs of desperation by baring their fangs and exhibiting their notoriously heinous character.  

Long before the Wikipedia abuse of Mia Love and David Chalian’s abuse of the Romneys, liberals have been reflecting their election angst by abandoning whatever minimal pretense to civility and civil discourse they ever had.

For example, last winter Samuel L. Jackson revealed his true racist self in an expletive-laden, N-word-filled interview in Ebony. . .  (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=27770.)

Who's Yo Daddy, Barry?

Who's Yo Daddy, Barry?

A blurb for a dvd titled “Dreams from My Real Father, a Story of Reds and Deception” directed by filmmaker Joel Gilbert attracted my attention since so many of the supposed details  published in Barack  Hussein Obama’s two memoirs have been proven to be either imaginative fabrications or outright lies.

Furthermore, the authorship of both Dreams from My Father (1995, 2004) and The Audacity of Hope (2006) has been called into question by highly reputable textual and publishing fraud experts who strongly suspect Bill Ayers and other Obamabuddies wrote what our president claims he wrote.

Compound their doubts with the commonsensical queries of whether a 34 year old would write a memoir  or how a 45 year old would have the time to compose a 403 page book while serving as Illinois state senator and campaigning to become a United States senator and president without significant assistance and the issues of Obama’s credibility and honesty are called into question. 

Gilbert’s challenging Obama’s true parentage merely adds yet another strange fillip to the many mysteries concerning the background, education, and philosophical motivations of the most mysterious and easily the scariest president in American history.  
      The “Dreams from My Real Father” website, http://tiny.cc/3pmdjw, outlines what may best be described as an appeal to the American electorate to stand up and take notice of the grave mistake made four years ago and the far more severe gravity of repeating that mistake on November 6th. 

The documentary traces the career of the youthful Occidental College Marxist to and through evidently photo-shopped pictures depicting him with his white mother who oddly sports a large, black right hand where her small, white right hand should be. 

“Dreams from My Real Father” also alleges Barry’s mom Stanley Ann Dunham worked as an amateur porno queen during her younger years, an outrageous charge to make except for the inclusion of a video and still photos featuring a woman who if not Stanley Ann bears a remarkable resemblance to her. . .

(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=27708.)

Lost Hope and Gained Chains

Lost Hope and Gained Chains

(Via Hope n’ Change, on a tip from Shawn on Moonbattery.com)

When President Barack Hussein Obama said with a straight face on “Entertainment Tonight” that ”I don’t think you or anybody who’s been watching the campaign would say that in any way we have tried to divide the country. We’ve always tried to bring the country together,” no one dared snicker and no one dared label him the lying hypocrite he is. 

Someone should have.  He was speaking in a fitting venue, entertainment, but he wasn’t remotely entertaining except to his diehard idolators who still think his every word emanates from an Anointed One.
  In 2008, Barack Hussein Obama sold his candidacy to 52.9% of the electorate based on the designedly vague  rhetoric of bringing hope to a war-weary, financially shell-shocked nation and he offered a blurry pledge to effect transparent, presumably beneficial changes Americans could believe in. 

Four years later, with wars still raging in Afghanistan and in various other Mideast countries, with armed conflict on the cusp of erupting in others, and with an economy barely marginally improved, many of us have far less hope that this president can accomplish meaningful and worthwhile change over the
course of a second term. 

In fact, many of us believe government brought about the banking crisis by pressuring lending institutions to loan mortgage money to deadbeats who thought payback was optional and that, unlike Obama, thought government was the problem, not the solution.  Many of us also believed, unlike Obama, that the United States of America was and is a damned great country in need of at most minor tweaking rather than radical alteration.        

  Not unexpectedly, what we got was more intrusive government, billions in phenomenal misspending, trillions  tacked onto our national debt which will impoverish our children and grandchildren, wildly imbalanced annual budgets, a first-ever downgrading of the nation’s credit rating, unprecedented and  dangerous changes in medical coverage, and less transparency than Tricky Dick Nixon could have ever envisioned.    

In all fairness, however, and despite the questionable merits of Obama’s “achievements”, let’s give the devil his due.  Obama has accomplished many of his unstated goals: 

.  The president has succeeded in dividing the nation like it hasn’t been divided since the 1860′s and he continues to pit race against race and class against class with his campaign of divisiveness as if his political future depends on it, which it does;

.  The president has demonized the peaceful, law-abiding tea party movement while lauding the destructive, lawless Occupy Everything crazies who represent everything law-abiding people abhor; . . .

(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=27635.)

America's One-Sided Race War, Part III

America's One-Sided Race War, Part III

The ostensibly vulgar word ”Niggerization” is apparently okay with left-wingers when spoken by a black man in the throes of villifying Mitt Romney for saying, “This is what an angry and desperate presidency looks like” and “Mr. President, take your campaign of division and anger and hate back to Chicago.” 

In an amazingly dumb rant on Thursday’s edition of MSNBC’s “The Cycle,” co-host Touré  Neblett interpreted Romney’s description of Barack Hussein Obama’s presidency and the governor’s suggestion that the Obama campaign is based on hatred and divisiveness as racist. 

  Touré, who goes by a single name since he perceives himself as much a star as Rihanna and Beyonce’ and Gaga, outlined his indignation over Romney: ”I mean, that really bothered me.  You notice he says anger twice.  He’s really trying to use racial coding and access some really deep stereotypes about the angry black man.  This is part of the playbook against Obama, the “otherization”; he’s not like us.  I know it’s a heavy thing to say,  I don’t say it lightly, but this is Niggerization.  You are not one of use [sic]. You are like the scary black man we’ve been trained to fear.” (http://tiny.cc/rth7iw) 

In addition to using a variation of the banned N-word, Touré’s Romney attacks are offensive on many other levels and his paranoia and ignorance are showing. 

“Anger” has evolved into code for “angry black man”?  Romney maintains a racist “playbook against Obama”?  Is “otherization” any more a word than “niggerization”?  Is Touré less qualified than Al Sharpton to serve as an MSNBC host?  Is Touré engaging in tactical “racewarization”?
         
  The uproar involving Joe Biden’s transparent effort to scare African-American voters into again voting en masse for Obama-Biden in November was unusual in that most of Obama’s mainstream media climbed on board to criticize hapless Joe, unlike their non-reaction to Touré.

However, there was a method to the madness of Obama’s MSM: They wanted to force Biden off the ticket to make room for Hillary Clinton in the Number Two spot.  They failed because they didn’t appreciate the depth of Mrs. Clinton’s ego (second place? gasp!) and that what the court clown said to his largely black audience in Danville, Virginia, “They gonna put y’all back in chains”, was merely vintage Biden. 

To be sure, as Douglas Wilder the first black governor in America noted, The Bumbler’s comment was racist but Biden often makes racist remarks and the MSM rarely gets exercised by such comments by people in the public eye–as long as those people are liberals and/or blacks like Touré. 
   
The mainstreamers, lamestreamers to Sarah Palin, weren’t at all perturbed by Nation of Islam’s Louis Farrakhan warning to whites that, “We know your origin in the world.  We know how long you were set to live.  And unless you change, your end has come.” 

  The MSM weren’t in the least concerned over New Black Panther Party Minister King Shamir Ahabaz telling blacks, “You want freedom?  You’re gonna have to kill some crackers!  You’re gonna have to kill some of their babies!” 

The lamestreamers never took notice of candidate Obama's oblique racist strategizing in 2008, “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.”  

The beat goes on and the incendiary black rhetoric grows more vicious in America’s one-sided race war.
 
Encouraged by the president of the United States allowing our attorney general to disgrace the Department of Justice by converting it into a black racist defense agency, by Obama’s falsely accusing a white Cambridge, Massachusetts cop of stupidity for enforcing the law, by his taking sides in the George Zimmerman-Trayvon Martin case, and by virtue of numerous other twisted executive branch decisions and  decrees, the New Black Panther Party is becoming more ballsy in its militant threats. . .

(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=27607.)

CNN's Soledad O'Brien and Fareed Zakaria Exposed

CNN's Soledad O'Brien and Fareed Zakaria Exposed

CNN’s María de la Soledad Teresa O’Brien, aka Soledad O’Brien, is certainly better looking than CNN’s Fareed Rafiq Zakaria although as she approaches 50 years of age Ms. O’Brien should realize that serving as eye candy won’t always cut it even on Ted Turner’s liberal cable network. 
Not that they won’t fully recover but O’Brien and Zakaria have been outed as the over-achieving leftist hacks they have always been. 
In the lady’s case, she has again been revealed as nothing more than a nincompoopette newsreader and the Bombay native has been caught plagiarizing material for a column he wrote about gun control.  O’Brien escaped censure by her employer for being a consistent nimrod; Zakaria was suspended for a month by Time magazine and for an indefinite period by CNN for excerpting without attribution (stealing) the words of Jill Lepore.   
Are those the scents of favoritism and discrimination I detect in the air? 
Hardly! Good grief!  Neither Time and CNN would ever sink into politically incorrect sexism by favoring women over men no matter how dumb the woman is nor would they ever unfairly treat a naturalized American, presuming the woman and the new citizen were liberals.
  In any event, Soledad O’Brien’s sins were far less grievous than Fareed Zakaria’s.  CNN might very well consider them virtues rather than journalistic flaws.
Soledad merely borrowed the definition of Critical Race Theory from Wikipedia since she didn’t know anything about the black racist CRT, attacked the Paul Ryan House GOP Budget Plan using cribbed notes  from the left-wing blog “Talking Points” since she couldn’t come up with ideas of her own, and so embarrassed herself by mouthing Democrat lies concerning Medicare cuts that John Sununu was forced to suggest that she should “put an Obama bumper sticker on her forehead.”               
Sporting a bumper sticker anywhere on her face wouldn’t go over very well on television anymore than would Soledad’s admissions on CNN that she knew less about racist theories, Democrat budget distortions, and Republican Medicare proposals than Katie Couric knows about professional ethics.   
Fareed, however, is a whole other matter.  .  .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=27595.)

Romney/Ryan Will Lose to Obama/Biden

Romney/Ryan Will Lose to Obama/Biden

It’s highly unlikely that Gov. Mitt Romney’s choice of Rep. Paul Ryan as his vice-presidential running mate will meaningfully affect the results of the fall election.   
As long as the Republican camp continues to follow the John McCain losing style of gentlemanly, gloves-on, above-the-fray politics, the Ryan pick won’t make a bloody bit of difference in the outcome on November 6th and Obama/Biden will win a second term. 
Sen. McCain’s chief mistake was not grasping the import of Barack Hussein Obama’s Chicago connections and his Windy City approach to gutter politics.  Obama made that approach to campaigning vividly clear four years ago at a Philadelphia fundraiser in June, 2008.  To counter Republican attacks, he threatened in classic Chicago fashion, “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.” 
  Presumably, Obama was speaking metaphorically but given Chicago’s reputation as the murder capital of America, who knows? 
The fight is now joined and unless someone frisks the candidates, Obama/Biden will blow Romney/Ryan out of the water.  Everyone knows that guns are far more effective than knives in a brawl, a hard lesson Sen. McCain learned when he chose the high road in 2008 by not getting down and dirty with the dirtiest politician since LBJ. 
During that campaign, McCain took the high road and lost to an inexperienced, unqualified, over-achieving upstart whose  vacuous promises of hopey-change, an ability to orate, and his semi-black race constituted his only advantages.  To date, Romney has pursued a similar route to defeat while Obama, ably assisted by his campaign and mainstream media henchmen, has lambasted him as a tax cheat, a felon, a murderer. 
Even Ann Romney has been subjected to media abuse and the Romneys’ Mormon religion has been thrown into the sick mix.
Barack Obama will stop at nothing to guaranty he gets the chance to exercise that “flexibility” he whispered about to Russian President Medvedev; Mitt Romney seems prepared to do nothing aside from expressing his indignation over Obamian lies and slanders, a sure-fire tactic for losing to a soul-less street fighter.      
McCain refused to make issues of Obama’s racist pastor of 20 years Rev. Jeremiah “God Damn America” Wright, Obama’s close ties. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=27578.)